Legal, but not constitutional: how the government is weasel wording the public about Edward Snowden and the NSA

Progressive Culture | Scholars & Rogues

Homeland Security PrecrimeThe Edward Snowden/NSA/PRISM uproar continues, and in the argument over whether or not he’s a Real American Patriot or your basic criminal vigilante the whole fucking point is getting lost. In fact, that argument is precisely the one that the Obama administration and the GOP’s security-state architects want us waging because it distracts us from the actual issue we need to be discussing.

You may have noticed, in reading the various statements from government officials, the recurrence of a theme: the program that Snowden exposed is legal. Keep track of how many times you hear that word. It’s. All. LEGAL.

Yes it is. And the effectiveness of the government’s rhetoric right now is unfortunately due, in part, to the language employed by the left over the past decade, which has lambasted the Bush administration’s illegal domestic spying program. Illegal. Legal. Therein lies the problem. (I have to…

View original post 492 more words

One thought on “Legal, but not constitutional: how the government is weasel wording the public about Edward Snowden and the NSA

  1. Unfortunately, I have become very cynical in my old age, and I think that the last line of this article is the most important part… I think everything that we are told is “spun” in some way, and it is virtually impossible to get any kind of “truth” other than “this is what this side wants you to believe”.

    Like

Comments are closed.